In Telamon Corp. v. Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co., the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana held that a Vice-President of Major Accounts who provided management and marketing services to a telecommunications company was not an “Employee” within the meaning of the employee theft coverage afforded by its Travelers Wrap+ policy, but rather an independent contractor.
U.S. District Court finds Insured’s Vice-President to be Independent Contractor falling outside Crime Policy’s Employee Theft Coverage
June 2016
Blaney McMurtry LLP, Ontario
