Drover et al. v Smith et al., 2013 NLTD(G) 150.
The Drovers were injured in an accident that occurred while they were passengers in a rental vehicle driven by their son. The Drovers claimed that they were entitled to coverage under the SEF 44 Family Protection Endorsement included on the automobile policy (the “Policy”) for their son’s principal vehicle.
Montreal,
Saskatchewan
Edmonton,
Manitoba
British Columbia
Ottawa,
Toronto,
Québec,
Atlantic Canada
Calgary,
