Knowledge Centre

Compelling Attendance at an Examination Under Oath Requires Notice but not Reason

Sasha Willms, Summer Student
August 2017 Kelly Santini LLP, Ontario

Aviva Insurance Company of Canada v McKeown2017 ONCA 563 – This case resulted from an appeal from Aviva Insurance Company of Canada (“Aviva”) regarding notice an insurer must provide to examine under oath (“examination) an applicant claiming benefits under the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule – O. Reg 34/10 (the “Schedule”). At issue was whether the application judge correctly interpreted section 33(4)3 of the Schedule and the meaning of the phrase: “[t]he reason or reasons for the examination.”

Read more

Comments are closed.